Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.
Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Obstetrics and Gynecology ClinicsAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Current contraceptive status among women aged 15-44: United States, 2011-2013.NCHS Data Brief. 2014; 173: 1-8
- Tubal sterilization trends in the United States.Fertil Steril. 2010; 94: 1-6
- Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 2006.Natl Health Stat Report. 2009; 11: 1-25
Pollack AE, Konnin LM, Haws JM, et al. Postpartum tubal sterilization in the United States, 1988–1994 [abstract]. 1997: Presented at the 1997 APHA Annual Meeting. Indianapolis, IN, November 9-13, 1997.
- The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 174: 1161-1168
- Safety of abortion and tubal sterilization performed separately versus concurrently.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 152: 619-623
- Complications of laparoscopic sterilization. Comparison of 2 methods.Obstet Gynecol. 1979; 54: 54-59
- Sterilization failures and their causes.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 152: 395-403
- Reducing bipolar sterilization failures.Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 74: 60-63
- Pregnancy after tubal sterilization with bipolar electrocoagulation. U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group.Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 94: 163-167
- Two randomized controlled trials comparing the Hulka and Filshie clips for sterilization.Contraception. 2000; 62: 169-175
- A comparison of different laparoscopic sterilization occlusion techniques in 24439 procedures.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982; 144: 309-331
- Evaluation of contemporary female sterilization methods.J Reprod Med. 1981; 26: 439-453
- Laparoscopic sterilization: a comparison of current techniques.J Reprod Med. 1988; 33: 463-466
- Is there any evidence for a post-tubal sterilization syndrome?.Fertil Steril. 1998; 69: 179-186
- The risk of menstrual abnormalities after tubal sterilization. U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group.N Engl J Med. 2000; 343: 1681-1687
- Gross and histologic examination of tubal ligation failures in a residency training program.Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 76: 461-465
- Postpartum sterilization with the titanium clip: a systematic review.Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 118 ([Erratum appears in Obstet Gynecol 2011;188:961]): 143-147
- Comparative efficacy of postpartum sterilization with the titanium clip versus partial salpingectomy: a randomized controlled trial.BJOG. 2013; 120: 108-112
- Minilaparotomy and endoscopic techniques for tubal sterilization.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004; (CD001328)
- The role of the fallopian tube in the origin on ovarian cancer.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 209: 409-414
- Spontaneous pregnancy after bilateral salpingectomy.Fertil Steril. 2005; 83: 767-768
- Tubal pregnancy after sterilization.Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1975; 82: 58-60
- Tubal ligation and the risk of ovarian cancer: review and meta-analysis.Hum Reprod Update. 2011; 17: 55-67
- Tubal ligation and risk of ovarian cancer subtypes: a pooled analysis of case-control studies.Int J Epidemiol. 2013; 42: 579-589
- Opportunistic salpingectomies for the prevention of a high-grade serous carcinoma: a statement by the Kommission Ovar of the AGO.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015; 292: 231-234
- Total salpingectomy during abdominal hysterectomy: effects on ovarian reserve and ovarian stromal blood flow.J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007; 33: 863-869
- Short-term effects of salpingectomy during laparoscopic hysterectomy on ovarian reserve: a pilot randomized controlled trial.Fertil Steril. 2013; 100: 1704-1708
- Surgical outcomes and complications of prophylactic salpingectomy at the time of benign hysterectomy in premenopausal women.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015; 22: 253-257
- Prophylactic bilateral salpingectomy (PBS) to reduce ovarian cancer risk incorporated in standard premenopausal hysterectomy: complications and re-operation rate.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2014; 140: 859-865
- Opportunistic salpingectomy: uptake, risks, and complications of a regional initiative for ovarian cancer prevention.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 210: 471.e1-471.e11
- Prophylactic salpingectomy in premenopausal low-risk women for ovarian cancer: primum no nocere.Gyncol Oncol. 2013; 129: 448-451
- Essure: a new device for hysteroscopic tubal sterilization in an outpatient setting.Fertil Steril. 2004; 82: 196-199
- Reliability of laparoscopic compared with hysteroscopic sterilization at one year: a decision analysis.Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 118: 273-279
- Predictive factors of Essure® implant placement failure: prospective, multicenter study of 495 patients.Fertil Steril. 2010; 93: 29-34
- Tubal risk markers for failure to place transcervical sterilization coils.Contraception. 2012; 85: 384-388
- Pregnancies after hysteroscopic sterilization: a systematic review.Contraception. 2013; 87: 539-548
- Efficacy of Essure hysteroscopic sterilization—5 years follow up of 1200 women.Gynecol Endocrinol. 2013; 29: 580-582
- Prospective analysis of office-based hysteroscopic sterilization.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2006; 13: 98-101
- Hysteroscopic sterilization in a large group practice.Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 114: 1227-1231
- Post-Essure hysterosalpingography compliance in a clinic population.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008; 15: 431-434
- Adverse events due to suspected nickel hypersensitivity in patients with Essure micro-inserts.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011; 18: 475-482
- Poststerilization regret: findings from the United States Collaborative Review of Sterilization.Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 93: 889-895
- Incidence, risk factors, and prevention of poststerilization regret in women: an updated international review from an epidemiologic perspective.Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1994; 49: 722-732
- The risk for ectopic pregnancy after tubal sterilization.N Engl J Med. 1997; 336: 762-767
- Contraceptive failure in the United States.Contraception. 2011; 83: 397-404
- A long-term study of mortality rate in men who have undergone vasectomy.N Engl J Med. 1992; 326: 1392
- How little is enough? The evidence for post-vasectomy testing.J Urol. 2005; 147: 29-36
- Microsurgical reanastamosis of the fallopian tube for reversal of sterilization.Obstet Gynecol. 1981; 58: 148-151
- Sterilization reversal: fertility results.Hum Reprod. 1995; 10: 1145-1151
- Tubal anastomosis after tubal sterilization: a review.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011; 283: 1149-1158
- Clinical factors determining pregnancy outcome after microsurgical tubal reanastamosis.Fertil Steril. 2009; 92: 1198-1202
- Tubal anastomosis: pregnancy success following reversal of Falope ring or monopolar cautery sterilization.Fertil Steril. 1987; 48: 13-17
- Vasectomy reversal-microsurgery for best results.Br J Urol. 1994; 73: 449-453
- Pregnancy rate after vasectomy reversal in a contemporary series: influence of smoking, semen quality and post-surgical use of assisted reproductive techniques.BJU Int. 2012; 110: 562-567
- Factors predicting overall success: a review of 747 microsurgical vasovasostomies.Can Urol Assoc J. 2007; 1: 388-394
- Cost-effectiveness of contraceptives in the United States.Contraception. 2009; 79: 5-14
- An economic comparison of female sterilization of hysteroscopic tubal occlusion with laparoscopic bilateral tubal ligation.Contraception. 2009; 80: 254-260
Article info
Publication history
Published online: September 15, 2015
Footnotes
Author Disclosure: Dr C. Moss has no disclosures. Dr M.M. Isley is a trainer for Nexplanon (Merck). She is also in the speaker bureau for Liletta (Actavis Pharma).
Identification
Copyright
© 2015 Elsevier Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
