Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 42, ISSUE 4, P557-567, December 2015

Increasing Use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception to Decrease Unplanned Pregnancy

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Finer L.B.
        • Zolna M.R.
        Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006.
        Contraception. 2011; 84: 478-485
        • Finer L.B.
        • Jerman J.
        • Kavanaugh M.L.
        Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007–2009.
        Fertil Steril. 2012; 98: 893-897
        • Trussell J.
        Contraceptive failure in the United States.
        Contraception. 2011; 83: 397-404
        • Winner B.
        • Peipert J.F.
        • Zhao Q.
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception.
        N Engl J Med. 2012; 366: 1998-2007
        • O'Neil-Callahan M.
        • Peipert J.F.
        • Zhao Q.
        • et al.
        Twenty-four-month continuation of reversible contraception.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 122: 1083-1091
        • Peipert J.F.
        • Zhao Q.
        • Allsworth J.E.
        • et al.
        Continuation and satisfaction of reversible contraception.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117: 1105-1113
        • Rosenstock J.R.
        • Peipert J.F.
        • Madden T.
        • et al.
        Continuation of reversible contraception in teenagers and young women.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120: 1298-1305
        • Dickerson L.M.
        • Diaz V.A.
        • Jordon J.
        • et al.
        Satisfaction, early removal, and side effects associated with long-acting reversible contraception.
        Fam Med. 2013; 45: 701-707
        • Peipert J.F.
        • Madden T.
        • Allsworth J.E.
        • et al.
        Preventing unintended pregnancies by providing no-cost contraception.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120: 1291-1297
        • Ricketts S.
        • Klingler G.
        • Schwalberg R.
        Game change in Colorado: widespread use of long-acting reversible contraceptives and rapid decline in births among young, low-income women.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014; 46: 125-132
        • Biggs M.A.
        • Rocca C.H.
        • Brindis C.D.
        • et al.
        Did increasing use of highly effective contraception contribute to declining abortions in Iowa?.
        Contraception. 2015; 91: 167-173
        • Secura G.M.
        • Madden T.
        • McNicholas C.
        • et al.
        Provision of no-cost, long-acting contraception and teenage pregnancy.
        N Engl J Med. 2014; 371: 1316-1323
        • Jones R.K.
        • Darroch J.E.
        • Henshaw S.K.
        Contraceptive use among U.S. women having abortions in 2000-2001.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006; 34: 10
      1. United Nations PD. World contraceptive patterns 2013. 2013 [2/5/14]. Available at: www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/family/worldContraceptivePatternsWallChart2013.pdf. Accessed February 5, 2014.

        • Sivin I.
        Another look at the Dalkon Shield: meta-analysis underscores its problems.
        Contraception. 1993; 48: 1-12
        • Borrero S.
        • Nikolajski C.
        • Steinberg J.R.
        • et al.
        “It just happens”: a qualitative study exploring low-income women’s perspectives on pregnancy intention and planning.
        Contraception. 2015; 91: 150-156
        • Higgins J.A.
        • Popkin R.A.
        • Santelli J.S.
        Pregnancy ambivalence and contraceptive use among young adults in the United States.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012; 44: 236-243
        • Foster D.G.
        • Higgins J.A.
        • Karasek D.
        • et al.
        Attitudes toward unprotected intercourse and risk of pregnancy among women seeking abortion.
        Womens Health Issues. 2012; 22: e149-e155
        • Frohwirth L.
        • Moore A.M.
        • Maniaci R.
        Perceptions of susceptibility to pregnancy among U.S. women obtaining abortions.
        Soc Sci Med. 2013; 99: 18-26
        • Biggs M.A.
        • Karasek D.
        • Foster D.G.
        Unprotected intercourse among women wanting to avoid pregnancy: attitudes, behaviors, and beliefs.
        Womens Health Issues. 2012; 22: e311-e318
        • Hladky K.J.
        • Allsworth J.E.
        • Madden T.
        • et al.
        Women's knowledge about intrauterine contraception.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117: 48-54
        • McCracken K.A.
        • Loveless M.
        Teen pregnancy: an update.
        Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 26: 355-359
      2. Facts on American Teens' Sources of Information about Sex 2012 [June 19, 2015]. Available at: www.guttmacher.org/pubs/FB-Teen-Sex-Ed.html#12. Accessed June 19, 2015.

        • Teal S.B.
        • Romer S.E.
        Awareness of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Among Teens and Young Adults.
        J Adolesc Health. 2013; 52: S35-S39
        • Luchowski A.T.
        • Anderson B.L.
        • Power M.L.
        • et al.
        Obstetrician-gynecologists and contraception: practice and opinions about the use of IUDs in nulliparous women, adolescents and other patient populations.
        Contraception. 2014; 89: 572-577
        • Tyler C.P.
        • Whiteman M.K.
        • Zapata L.B.
        • et al.
        Health care provider attitudes and practices related to intrauterine devices for nulliparous women.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 119: 762-771
        • Harper C.C.
        • Blum M.
        • de Bocanegra H.T.
        • et al.
        Challenges in translating evidence to practice: the provision of intrauterine contraception.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 111: 1359-1369
        • Stanwood N.L.
        • Garrett J.M.
        • Konrad T.R.
        Obstetrician-gynecologists and the intrauterine device: a survey of attitudes and practice.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 99: 275-280
        • Black K.I.
        • Lotke P.
        • Lira J.
        • et al.
        Global survey of healthcare practitioners’ beliefs and practices around intrauterine contraceptive method use in nulliparous women.
        Contraception. 2013; 88: 650-656
        • Gilmore K.
        • Hoopes A.J.
        • Cady J.
        • et al.
        Providing long-acting reversible contraception services in Seattle school-based health centers: key themes for facilitating implementation.
        J Adolesc Health. 2015; 56: 658-665
        • Luchowski A.T.
        • Anderson B.L.
        • Power M.L.
        • et al.
        Obstetrician-gynecologists and contraception: long-acting reversible contraception practices and education.
        Contraception. 2014; 89: 578-583
        • Legro R.S.
        Introduction: on-label and off-label drug use in reproductive medicine.
        Fertil Steril. 2015; 103: 581-582
        • Biggs M.A.P.
        • Harper C.C.P.
        • Malvin J.P.
        • et al.
        Factors influencing the provision of long-acting reversible contraception in California.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123: 593-602
        • Eisenberg D.
        • McNicholas C.
        • Peipert J.F.
        Cost as a barrier to long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use in adolescents.
        J Adolesc Health. 2013; 52: S59-63
        • Gariepy A.M.
        • Simon E.J.
        • Patel D.A.
        • et al.
        The impact of out-of-pocket expense on IUD utilization among women with private insurance.
        Contraception. 2011; 84: e39-e42
        • Pace L.E.
        • Dusetzina S.B.
        • Fendrick A.M.
        • et al.
        The impact of out-of-pocket costs on the use of intrauterine contraception among women with employer-sponsored insurance.
        Med Care. 2013; 51: 959-963
      3. Insurance coverage of contraceptives. Guttmacher Institute, 2015.

        • Bergin A.
        • Tristan S.
        • Terplan M.
        • et al.
        A missed opportunity for care: two-visit IUD insertion protocols inhibit placement.
        Contraception. 2012; 86: 694-697
        • Biggs M.A.
        • Arons A.
        • Turner R.
        • et al.
        Same-day LARC insertion attitudes and practices.
        Contraception. 2013; 88: 629-635
        • Fox M.C.
        • Oat-Judge J.
        • Severson K.
        • et al.
        Immediate placement of intrauterine devices after first and second trimester pregnancy termination.
        Contraception. 2011; 83: 34-40
        • Cremer M.
        • Bullard K.A.
        • Mosley R.M.
        • et al.
        Immediate vs. delayed post-abortal copper T 380A IUD insertion in cases over 12 weeks of gestation.
        Contraception. 2011; 83: 522-527
        • Bednarek P.H.
        • Creinin M.D.
        • Reeves M.F.
        • et al.
        Immediate versus delayed IUD insertion after uterine aspiration.
        N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 2208-2217
        • Thompson K.M.J.
        • Speidel J.J.
        • Saporta V.
        • et al.
        Contraceptive policies affect post-abortion provision of long-acting reversible contraception.
        Contraception. 2011; 83: 41-47
        • Ogburn J.A.
        • Espey E.
        • Stonehocker J.
        Barriers to intrauterine device insertion in postpartum women.
        Contraception. 2005; 72: 426-429
        • Aiken A.R.A.
        • Creinin M.D.
        • Kaunitz A.M.
        • et al.
        Global fee prohibits postpartum provision of the most effective reversible contraceptives.
        Contraception. 2014; 90: 466-467
        • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Gynecologic Practice
        • Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Working Group
        ACOG Committee Opinion No. 450: increasing use of contraceptive implants and intrauterine devices to reduce unintended pregnancy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 114: 1434-1438
        • Committee on Adolescent Health Care Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Working Group
        • The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
        Committee Opinion No. 539: adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120: 983-988
        • Committee on Adolescence
        Contraception for adolescents.
        Pediatrics. 2014; 134: e1244-e1256
        • Randel A.
        Guidelines for the use of long-acting reversible contraceptives.
        Am Fam Physician. 2012; 85: 403-404
        • Division of Reproductive Health
        • National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
        U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2013: adapted from the World Health Organization selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2nd edition.
        MMWR Recomm Rep. 2013; 62: 1-60