Review Article| Volume 42, ISSUE 4, P569-582, December 2015

Immediate Postpartum Intrauterine Contraception Insertion


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.


      Subscribe to Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • MacDorman M.F.
        • Matthews T.J.
        • Declercq E.
        Trends in out-of-hospital births in the United States, 1990–2012.
        NCHS Data Brief. 2014; : 1-8
      1. Organization WHO. Trends in maternal mortality: 1990 to 2013. Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, The World Bank and the United Nations Population Division. Geneva (Switzerland): WHO; 2014.

        • Whitaker A.K.
        • Endres L.K.
        • Mistretta S.Q.
        • et al.
        Postplacental insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device after cesarean delivery vs. delayed insertion: a randomized controlled trial.
        Contraception. 2014; 89: 534-539
        • Ogburn J.A.
        • Espey E.
        • Stonehocker J.
        Barriers to intrauterine device insertion in postpartum women.
        Contraception. 2005; 72: 426-429
      2. Global Health Observatory (GHO) Data. World Health Organization; 2015. Available at: Accessed May 11, 2015.

        • Weston M.R.
        • Martins S.L.
        • Neustadt A.B.
        • et al.
        Factors influencing uptake of intrauterine devices among postpartum adolescents: a qualitative study.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 206: 40.e1-40.e7
        • Asker C.
        • Stokes-Lampard H.
        • Beavan J.
        • et al.
        What is it about intrauterine devices that women find unacceptable? Factors that make women non-users: a qualitative study.
        J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2006; 32: 89-94
        • Hubacher D.
        • Reyes V.
        • Lillo S.
        • et al.
        Pain from copper intrauterine device insertion: randomized trial of prophylactic ibuprofen.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 195: 1272-1277
        • Goldstuck N.D.
        • Matthews M.L.
        A comparison of the actual and expected pain response following insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device.
        Clin Reprod Fertil. 1985; 3: 65-71
        • Murty J.
        Use and effectiveness of oral analgesia when fitting an intrauterine device.
        J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2003; 29: 150-151
        • Bednarek P.H.
        • Creinin M.D.
        • Reeves M.F.
        • et al.
        Prophylactic ibuprofen does not improve pain with IUD insertion: a randomized trial.
        Contraception. 2015; 91: 193-197
        • Chen B.A.
        • Reeves M.F.
        • Hayes J.L.
        • et al.
        Postplacental or delayed insertion of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device after vaginal delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 116: 1079-1087
        • Xu J.X.
        • Rivera R.
        • Dunson T.R.
        • et al.
        A comparative study of two techniques used in immediate postplacental insertion (IPPI) of the Copper T-380A IUD in Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
        Contraception. 1996; 54: 33-38
        • Committee on Adolescent Health Care Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Working Group
        • The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
        Committee opinion no. 539: adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120: 983-988
        • Prager S.
        • Darney P.D.
        The levonorgestrel intrauterine system in nulliparous women.
        Contraception. 2007; 75: S12-S15
        • Madden T.
        • McNicholas C.
        • Zhao Q.
        • et al.
        Association of age and parity with intrauterine device expulsion.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 124: 718-726
        • Kapp N.
        • Curtis K.M.
        Intrauterine device insertion during the postpartum period: a systematic review.
        Contraception. 2009; 80: 327-336
        • Lester F.
        • Kakaire O.
        • Byamugisha J.
        • et al.
        Intracesarean insertion of the Copper T380A versus 6 weeks postcesarean: a randomized clinical trial.
        Contraception. 2015; 91: 198-203
        • Celen S.
        • Moroy P.
        • Sucak A.
        • et al.
        Clinical outcomes of early postplacental insertion of intrauterine contraceptive devices.
        Contraception. 2004; 69: 279-282
        • Chi I.C.
        • Wilkens L.
        • Rogers S.
        Expulsions in immediate postpartum insertions of Lippes Loop D and Copper T IUDs and their counterpart Delta devices–an epidemiological analysis.
        Contraception. 1985; 32: 119-134
        • Grimes D.A.
        • Lopez L.M.
        • Schulz K.F.
        • et al.
        Immediate post-partum insertion of intrauterine devices.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; (CD003036)
        • Heinemann K.
        • Reed S.
        • Moehner S.
        • et al.
        Risk of uterine perforation with levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices in the European Active Surveillance Study on Intrauterine Devices.
        Contraception. 2015; 91: 274-279
      3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. US Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraception Use, 2010: Adapted from the World Health Organization Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 4th edition. MMWR 2010;59(No. RR-4):1-88.

        • Washington C.I.
        • Jamshidi R.
        • Thung S.F.
        • et al.
        Timing of postpartum intrauterine device placement: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
        Fertil Steril. 2015; 103: 131-137