Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 42, ISSUE 4, P583-591, December 2015

Immediate Intrauterine Device Insertion Following Surgical Abortion

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Finer L.B.
        • Henshaw S.K.
        Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006; 38: 90-96
        • Jones R.K.
        • Darroch J.E.
        • Henshaw S.K.
        Contraceptive use among U.S. women having abortions in 2000-2001.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2002; 34: 294-303
        • Heikinheimo O.
        • Gissler M.
        • Suhonen S.
        Age, parity, history of abortion and contraceptive choices affect the risk of repeat abortion.
        Contraception. 2008; 78: 149-154
        • Goodman S.
        • Hendlish S.K.
        • Reeves M.F.
        • et al.
        Impact of immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine contraception on repeat abortion.
        Contraception. 2008; 78: 143-148
        • Marrs R.P.
        • Kletzky O.A.
        • Howard W.F.
        • et al.
        Disappearance of human chorionic gonadotropin and resumption of ovulation following abortion.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979; 135: 731-736
        • Reeves M.F.
        • Smith K.J.
        • Creinin M.D.
        Contraceptive effectiveness of immediate compared with delayed insertion of intrauterine devices after abortion: a decision analysis.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 109: 1286-1294
        • Stanwood N.L.
        • Grimes D.A.
        • Schulz K.F.
        Insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device after induced or spontaneous abortion: a review of the evidence.
        BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001; 108: 1168-1173
        • Fox M.C.
        • Oat-Judge J.
        • Severson K.
        • et al.
        Immediate placement of intrauterine devices after first and second trimester pregnancy termination.
        Contraception. 2011; 83: 34-40
        • Okusanya B.O.
        • Oduwole O.
        • Effa E.E.
        Immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine devices.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (CD001777)
        • Bednarek P.H.
        • Creinin M.D.
        • Reeves M.F.
        • et al.
        Immediate versus delayed IUD insertion after uterine aspiration.
        N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 2208-2217
        • Hohmann H.L.
        • Reeves M.F.
        • Chen B.A.
        • et al.
        Immediate versus delayed insertion of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device following dilation and evacuation: a randomized controlled trial.
        Contraception. 2012; 85: 240-245
        • Cremer M.
        • Bullard K.A.
        • Mosley R.M.
        • et al.
        Immediate vs. delayed post-abortal copper T 380A IUD insertion in cases over 12 weeks of gestation.
        Contraception. 2011; 83: 522-527
        • Drey E.A.
        • Reeves M.F.
        • Ogawa D.D.
        • et al.
        Insertion of intrauterine contraceptives immediately following first- and second-trimester abortions.
        Contraception. 2009; 79: 397-402
        • Madden T.
        • McNicholas C.
        • Zhao Q.
        • et al.
        Association of age and parity with intrauterine device expulsion.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 124: 718-726
        • Sivin I.
        • el Mahgoub S.
        • McCarthy T.
        • et al.
        Long-term contraception with the levonorgestrel 20 mcg/day (LNg 20) and the copper T 380Ag intrauterine devices: a five-year randomized study.
        Contraception. 1990; 42: 361-378
        • Workowski K.A.
        • Berman S.
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
        2010 STD treatment guidelines.
        MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010; 59 (Available at:) (Accessed May 14, 2015): 1-110
        • LeFevre M.L.
        Screening for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement Screening for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea.
        Ann Intern Med. 2014; 161: 902-910
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
        U.S. selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use.
        MMWR Recomm Rep. 2013; 62: 1-46
      1. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin: second trimester abortion. June 2013.

        • Achilles S.L.
        • Reeves M.F.
        Prevention of infection after induced abortion.
        Contraception. 2011; 83: 295-309
        • Sawaya G.F.
        • Grady D.
        • Kerlikowske K.
        • et al.
        Antibiotics at the time of induced abortion: the case for universal prophylaxis based on a meta-analysis.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 87: 884-890
        • Jones R.K.
        • Finer L.B.
        Who has second-trimester abortions in the United States?.
        Contraception. 2012; 85: 544-551
        • Drey E.A.
        • Foster D.G.
        • Jackson R.A.
        • et al.
        Risk factors associated with presenting for abortion in the second trimester.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 107: 128-135
        • Paul M.
        • Lichtenberg E.S.
        • Borgatta L.
        • et al.
        Management of unintended and abnormal pregnancy: comprehensive abortion care.
        Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester (United Kingdom)2009
        • Darney P.D.
        • Sweet R.L.
        Routine intraoperative ultrasonography for second trimester abortion reduces incidence of uterine perforation.
        J Ultrasound Med. 1989; 8: 71-75
      2. Department of Reproductive Health. WHO | Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 4th edition. 2010. Available at: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/family_planning/9789241563888/en/. Accessed May 14, 2015.

        • Bednarek P.H.
        • Botha R.L.
        • Creinin M.D.
        • et al.
        The effect of immediate intrauterine device (IUD) insertion on bleeding patterns following first trimester suction aspiration.
        Fertil Steril. 2009; 92: S27
        • Suvisaari J.
        • Lähteenmäki P.
        Detailed analysis of menstrual bleeding patterns after postmenstrual and postabortal insertion of a copper IUD or a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.
        Contraception. 1996; 54: 201-208
      3. Update to CDC’s U.S. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2010: revised recommendations for the use of contraceptive methods during the postpartum period. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6026a3.htm. Accessed July 22, 2014.

        • Andersson K.
        • Ryde-Blomqvist E.
        • Lindell K.
        • et al.
        Perforations with intrauterine devices: Report from a Swedish survey.
        Contraception. 1998; 57: 251-255
        • Rinehart W.
        WHO updates medical eligibility criteria for contraceptives.
        Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore (MD)2004
      4. Improving access to quality care in family planning: medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. 3rd edition. World Health Organization, Geneva (Switzerland)2003
        • Diedrich J.T.
        • Drey E.A.
        • Dehlendorf C.
        • et al.
        Women’s questions after postabortion insertion of intrauterine contraception.
        Contraception. 2013; 88: 396-400