Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 48, ISSUE 2, P281-296, June 2021

Fetal Growth Curves

Is There a Universal Reference?

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 204: fetal growth restriction.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 133: e97-e109
        • Committee on Practice, B-O
        Macrosomia: ACOG practice bulletin, number 216.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 135: e18-e35
        • Battaglia F.C.
        • Lubchenco L.O.
        A practical classification of newborn infants by weight and gestational age.
        J Pediatr. 1967; 71: 159-163
        • Iliodromiti S.
        • Mackay D.F.
        • Smith G.C.
        • et al.
        Customised and noncustomised birth weight centiles and prediction of stillbirth and infant mortality and morbidity: a cohort study of 979,912 term singleton pregnancies in Scotland.
        PLoS Med. 2017; 14: e1002228
        • Vasak B.
        • Koenen S.V.
        • Koster M.P.
        • et al.
        Human fetal growth is constrained below optimal for perinatal survival.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 45: 162-167
        • Papageorghiou A.T.
        • Ohuma E.O.
        • Altman D.G.
        • et al.
        International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: the Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project.
        Lancet. 2014; 384: 869-879
        • Stirnemann J.
        • Villar J.
        • Salomon L.J.
        • et al.
        International estimated fetal weight standards of the INTERGROWTH-21st project.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 49: 478-486
        • Buck Louis G.M.
        • Grewal J.
        • Albert P.S.
        • et al.
        Racial/ethnic standards for fetal growth: the NICHD fetal growth studies.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 213: 449.e1-41
        • Buck Louis G.M.
        • Grewal J.
        Clarification of estimating fetal weight between 10-14 weeks gestation, NICHD fetal growth studies.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 217: 96-101
        • Grewal J.
        • Grantz K.L.
        • Zhang C.
        • et al.
        Cohort profile: NICHD fetal growth studies-singletons and twins.
        Int J Epidemiol. 2018; 47: 25-25l
        • Kiserud T.
        • Piaggio G.
        • Carroli G.
        • et al.
        The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: a multinational longitudinal study of ultrasound biometric measurements and estimated fetal weight.
        PLoS Med. 2017; 14: e1002220
        • Kiserud T.
        • Piaggio G.
        • Carroli G.
        • et al.
        Correction: the World Health Organization fetal growth charts: a multinational longitudinal study of ultrasound biometric measurements and estimated fetal weight.
        PLoS Med. 2017; 14: e1002284
        • Alexander G.R.
        • Himes J.H.
        • Kaufman R.B.
        • et al.
        A United States national reference for fetal growth.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 87: 163-168
        • Duryea E.L.
        • Hawkins J.S.
        • Mcintire D.D.
        • et al.
        A revised birth weight reference for the United States.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 124: 16-22
        • Barel O.
        • Vaknin Z.
        • Tovbin J.
        • et al.
        Assessment of the accuracy of multiple sonographic fetal weight estimation formulas: a 10-year experience from a single center.
        J Ultrasound Med. 2013; 32: 815-823
        • Gardosi J.O.
        Prematurity and fetal growth restriction.
        Early Hum Dev. 2005; 81: 43-49
        • Zhang J.
        • Sun K.
        Invited commentary: the incremental value of customization in defining abnormal fetal growth status.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2013; 178: 1309-1312
        • Gardosi J.
        Customized fetal growth standards: rationale and clinical application.
        Semin Perinatol. 2004; 28: 33-40
        • Hutcheon J.A.
        • Zhang X.
        • Platt R.W.
        • et al.
        The case against customised birthweight standards.
        Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2011; 25: 11-16
        • Carberry A.E.
        • Raynes-Greenow C.H.
        • Turner R.M.
        • et al.
        Customized versus population-based birth weight charts for the detection of neonatal growth and perinatal morbidity in a cross-sectional study of term neonates.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2013; 178: 1301-1308
        • Deter R.L.
        • Rossavik I.K.
        • Harrist R.B.
        Development of individual growth curve standards for estimated fetal weight: I. Weight estimation procedure.
        J Clin Ultrasound. 1988; 16: 215-225
        • Deter R.L.
        • Rossavik I.K.
        • Carpenter R.J.
        Development of individual growth standards for estimated fetal weight: II. Weight prediction during the third trimester and at birth.
        J Clin Ultrasound. 1989; 17: 83-88
        • Deter R.L.
        • Lee W.
        • Yeo L.
        • et al.
        Individualized growth assessment: conceptual framework and practical implementation for the evaluation of fetal growth and neonatal growth outcome.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 218: S656-S678
        • Owen P.
        • Ogston S.
        Conditional centiles for the quantification of fetal growth.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 11: 110-117
        • Royston P.
        Calculation of unconditional and conditional reference intervals for foetal size and growth from longitudinal measurements.
        Stat Med. 1995; 14: 1417-1436
        • Karlsen H.O.
        • Johnsen S.L.
        • Rasmussen S.
        • et al.
        Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome of small-for-gestational-age pregnancy using size centiles and conditional growth centiles.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 48: 217-223
        • Altman D.G.
        • Chitty L.S.
        Charts of fetal size: 1. Methodology.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994; 101: 29-34
        • Brenner W.E.
        • Edelman D.A.
        • Hendricks C.H.
        A standard of fetal growth for the United States of America.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976; 126: 555-564
        • Williams R.L.
        • Creasy R.K.
        • Cunningham G.C.
        • et al.
        Fetal growth and perinatal viability in California.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1982; 59: 624-632
        • Ioannou C.
        • Talbot K.
        • Ohuma E.
        • et al.
        Systematic review of methodology used in ultrasound studies aimed at creating charts of fetal size.
        BJOG. 2012; 119: 1425-1439
        • Grantz K.L.
        • Hediger M.L.
        • Liu D.
        • et al.
        Fetal growth standards: the NICHD fetal growth study approach in context with INTERGROWTH-21st and the World Health Organization Multicentre Growth Reference Study.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 218: S641-S655.e28
        • Hadlock F.P.
        • Harrist R.B.
        • Sharman R.S.
        • et al.
        Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements--a prospective study.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 151: 333-337
      2. WHO child growth standards based on length/height, weight and age.
        Acta Paediatr Suppl. 2006; 450: 76-85
        • De Onis M.
        • Garza C.
        • Victora C.G.
        • et al.
        The WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study: planning, study design, and methodology.
        Food Nutr Bull. 2004; 25: S15-S26
        • Villar J.
        • Papageorghiou A.T.
        • Pang R.
        • et al.
        The likeness of fetal growth and newborn size across non-isolated populations in the INTERGROWTH-21st project: the fetal growth longitudinal study and newborn cross-sectional study.
        Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014; 2: 781-792
        • Kiserud T.
        • Benachi A.
        • Hecher K.
        • et al.
        The World Health Organization fetal growth charts: concept, findings, interpretation, and application.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 218: S619-S629
        • Malina R.M.
        • Brown K.H.
        • Zavaleta A.N.
        Relative lower extremity length in Mexican American and in American black and white youth.
        Am J Phys Anthropol. 1987; 72: 89-94
        • Wulan S.N.
        • Westerterp K.R.
        • Plasqui G.
        Ethnic differences in body composition and the associated metabolic profile: a comparative study between Asians and Caucasians.
        Maturitas. 2010; 65: 315-319
        • Hadlock F.P.
        • Harrist R.B.
        • Martinez-Poyer J.
        In utero analysis of fetal growth: a sonographic weight standard.
        Radiology. 1991; 181: 129-133
        • Natale V.
        • Rajagopalan A.
        Worldwide variation in human growth and the World Health Organization growth standards: a systematic review.
        BMJ Open. 2014; 4: e003735
        • Bogin B.
        • Varela-Silva M.I.
        Leg length, body proportion, and health: a review with a note on beauty.
        Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010; 7: 1047-1075
        • Heymsfield S.B.
        • Peterson C.M.
        • Thomas D.M.
        • et al.
        Why are there race/ethnic differences in adult body mass index-adiposity relationships? A quantitative critical review.
        Obes Rev. 2016; 17: 262-275
        • Lambert C.
        • Gleason J.L.
        • Pugh S.J.
        • et al.
        Maternal socioeconomic factors and racial/ethnic differences in neonatal Anthropometry.
        Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17: 7323
        • Lunde A.
        • Melve K.K.
        • Gjessing H.K.
        • et al.
        Genetic and environmental influences on birth weight, birth length, head circumference, and gestational age by use of population-based parent-offspring data.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2007; 165: 734-741
        • Kramer M.S.
        Determinants of low birth weight: methodological assessment and meta-analysis.
        Bull World Health Organ. 1987; 65: 663-737
        • Clausson B.
        • Lichtenstein P.
        • Cnattingius S.
        Genetic influence on birthweight and gestational length determined by studies in offspring of twins.
        BJOG. 2000; 107: 375-381
        • Tekola-Ayele F.
        • Workalemahu T.
        • Amare A.T.
        High burden of birthweight-lowering genetic variants in Africans and Asians.
        BMC Med. 2018; 16: 70
        • Tekola-Ayele F.
        • Zhang C.
        • Wu J.
        • et al.
        Trans-ethnic meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies maternal ITPR1 as a novel locus influencing fetal growth during sensitive periods in pregnancy.
        PLoS Genet. 2020; 16: e1008747
        • Hanson M.A.
        • Gluckman P.D.
        Early developmental conditioning of later health and disease: physiology or pathophysiology?.
        Physiol Rev. 2014; 94: 1027-1076
        • Hanson M.
        • Kiserud T.
        • Visser G.H.
        • et al.
        Optimal fetal growth: a misconception?.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 213: 332.e1-4
        • Gluckman P.D.
        • Hanson M.A.
        • Buklijas T.
        A conceptual framework for the developmental origins of health and disease.
        J Dev Orig Health Dis. 2010; 1: 6-18
        • Frisancho A.R.
        Developmental functional adaptation to high altitude: review.
        Am J Hum Biol. 2013; 25: 151-168
        • Mikolajczyk R.T.
        • Zhang J.
        • Betran A.P.
        • et al.
        A global reference for fetal-weight and birthweight percentiles.
        Lancet. 2011; 377: 1855-1861
      3. WHO Growth Standards Are Recommended for Use with Children Younger Than Aged 2 Years in the United States.
        (Available at:)
        • Martins J.G.
        • Biggio J.R.
        • Abuhamad A.
        • Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Electronic Address, PSO
        Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #52: Diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction: (Replaces Clinical Guideline Number 3, April 2012).
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 223: B2-B17
      4. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 134: fetal growth restriction.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 121: 1122-1133
        • Grantz K.L.
        • Kim S.
        • Grobman W.A.
        • et al.
        Fetal growth velocity: the NICHD fetal growth studies.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 219: 285.e1-285.e36
        • Sovio U.
        • White I.R.
        • Dacey A.
        • et al.
        Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study: a prospective cohort study.
        Lancet. 2015; 386: 2089-2097
        • Ohuma E.O.
        • Villar J.
        • Feng Y.
        • et al.
        • Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st, C
        Fetal growth velocity standards from the fetal growth longitudinal study of the INTERGROWTH-21(st) project.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 224: 208.e1-e18
        • Hediger M.L.
        • Fuchs K.M.
        • Grantz K.L.
        • et al.
        Ultrasound quality assurance for singletons in the national institute of child health and human development fetal growth studies.
        J Ultrasound Med. 2016; 35: 1725-1733
        • Di Battista E.
        • Bertino E.
        • Benso L.
        • et al.
        Longitudinal distance standards of fetal growth. Intrauterine and Infant Longitudinal Growth Study: IILGS.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000; 79: 165-173
        • Gallivan S.
        • Robson S.C.
        • Chang T.C.
        • et al.
        An investigation of fetal growth using serial ultrasound data.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 3: 109-114
        • Jeanty P.
        • Cantraine F.
        • Romero R.
        • et al.
        A longitudinal study of fetal weight growth.
        J Ultrasound Med. 1984; 3: 321-328
        • Johnsen S.L.
        • Rasmussen S.
        • Wilsgaard T.
        • et al.
        Longitudinal reference ranges for estimated fetal weight.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006; 85: 286-297
        • Marsal K.
        • Persson P.H.
        • Larsen T.
        • et al.
        Intrauterine growth curves based on ultrasonically estimated foetal weights.
        Acta Paediatr. 1996; 85: 843-848
        • Mongelli M.
        • Gardosi J.
        Longitudinal study of fetal growth in subgroups of a low-risk population.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 6: 340-344
        • Nasrat H.
        • Bondagji N.S.
        Ultrasound biometry of Arabian fetuses.
        Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005; 88: 173-178
        • Salomon L.J.
        • Duyme M.
        • Crequat J.
        • et al.
        French fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with other charts.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 28: 193-198
        • Snijders R.J.
        • Nicolaides K.H.
        Fetal biometry at 14-40 weeks' gestation.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 4: 34-48