Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 48, ISSUE 2, P387-399, June 2021

Evaluation and Management of Fetal Macrosomia

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Martin J.A.
        • Hamilton B.E.
        • Osterman M.J.K.
        • et al.
        Births: final data for 2018.
        Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2019; 68: 1-47
        • Boulet S.L.
        • Alexander G.R.
        • Salihu H.M.
        • et al.
        Macrosomic births in the united states: determinants, outcomes, and proposed grades of risk.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 188: 1372-1378
        • King J.R.
        • Korst L.M.
        • Miller D.A.
        • et al.
        Increased composite maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with ultrasonographically suspected fetal macrosomia.
        J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012; 25: 1953-1959
        • Gillean J.R.
        • Coonrod D.V.
        • Russ R.
        • et al.
        Big infants in the neonatal intensive care unit.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 192 ([discussion: 1953–5]): 1948-1953
        • Cnattingius S.
        • Villamor E.
        • Lagerros Y.T.
        • et al.
        High birthweight and obesity--a vicious circle across generations.
        Int J Obes (Lond). 2012; 36: 1320-1324
        • Sparano S.
        • Ahrens W.
        • De Henauw S.
        • et al.
        Being macrosomic at birth is an independent predictor of overweight in children: results from the IDEFICS study.
        Matern Child Health J. 2013; 17: 1373-1381
        • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
        Macrosomia. Practice Bulletin no. 216.
        ACOG, Washington, DC2019
        • Bowers K.
        • Laughon S.K.
        • Kiely M.
        • et al.
        Gestational diabetes, pre-pregnancy obesity and pregnancy weight gain in relation to excess fetal growth: variations by race/ethnicity.
        Diabetologia. 2013; 56: 1263-1271
        • Marshall N.E.
        • Biel F.M.
        • Boone-Heinonen J.
        • et al.
        The association between maternal height, body mass index, and perinatal outcomes.
        Am J Perinatol. 2019; 36: 632-640
        • Su R.
        • Zhu W.
        • Wei Y.
        • et al.
        Relationship of maternal birth weight on maternal and neonatal outcomes: a multicenter study in Beijing.
        J Perinatol. 2016; 36: 1061-1066
        • Jolly M.C.
        • Sebire N.J.
        • Harris J.P.
        • et al.
        Risk factors for macrosomia and its clinical consequences: a study of 350,311 pregnancies.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003; 111: 9-14
        • Jin W.Y.
        • Lin S.L.
        • Hou R.L.
        • et al.
        Associations between maternal lipid profile and pregnancy complications and perinatal outcomes: a population-based study from China.
        BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016; 16: 60
        • Usta A.
        • Usta C.S.
        • Yildiz A.
        • et al.
        Frequency of fetal macrosomia and the associated risk factors in pregnancies without gestational diabetes mellitus.
        Pan Afr Med J. 2017; 26: 62
        • Sheiner E.
        • Levy A.
        • Katz M.
        • et al.
        Gender does matter in perinatal medicine.
        Fetal Diagn Ther. 2004; 19: 366-369
        • Maoz O.
        • Wainstock T.
        • Sheiner E.
        • et al.
        Immediate perinatal outcomes of post-term deliveries.
        J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019; 32: 1847-1852
        • Little S.E.
        • Edlow A.G.
        • Thomas A.M.
        • et al.
        Estimated fetal weight by ultrasound: a modifiable risk factor for cesrean delivery?.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 207: 309.e1-6
        • Black M.H.
        • Sacks D.A.
        • Xiang A.H.
        • et al.
        The relative contribution of prepregnancy overweight and obesity, gestational weight gain, and IADPSG-defined gestational diabetes mellitus to fetal overgrowth.
        Diabetes Care. 2013; 36: 56-62
        • Metzger B.E.
        • Lowe L.P.
        • Dyer A.R.
        • et al.
        HAPO study collaborative research group.
        N Engl J Med. 2008; 258: 1991-2002
        • Malin G.L.
        • Bugg G.J.
        • Takwoingi Y.
        • et al.
        Antenatal magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasound for predicting neonatal macrosomia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        BJOG. 2016; 123: 77-88
        • Chauhan S.P.
        • Hendrix N.W.
        • Magann E.F.
        • et al.
        Limitations of clinical and sonographic estimates of birthweight: experience with 1034 parturients.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 91: 72-77
        • Kadji C.
        • Cannie M.M.
        • Resta S.
        • et al.
        Magnetic resonance imaging for prenatal estimation of birthweight in pregnancy: review of available data, techniques, and future perspectives.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 220: 428-439
        • Noumi G.
        • Collado-Khoury F.
        • Bombard A.
        • et al.
        Clinical and sonographic estimation of fetal weight performed during labor by residents.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 192: 1407-1409
        • Goetzinger K.R.
        • Tuuli M.G.
        • Odibo A.O.
        • et al.
        Screening for fetal growth disorders by clinical exam in the era of obesity.
        J Perinatol. 2013; 33: 352-357
        • Persson B.
        • Stangenberg M.
        • Lunell N.O.
        • et al.
        Prediction of size of infants at birth by measurement of symphysis fundus height.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986; 93: 206-211
        • Weiner Z.
        • Ben-Shlomo I.
        • Beck-Fruchter R.
        • et al.
        Clinical and ultrasonographic weight estimation in large for gestational age fetus.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002; 105: 20-24
        • Peregrine E.
        • O'Brien P.
        • Jauniaux E.
        Clinical and ultrasound estimation of birthweight prior to induction of labor at term.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 29: 304-309
        • Scioscia M.
        • Vimercati A.
        • Ceci O.
        • et al.
        Estimation of birthweights by two-dimensional ultrasonography: a critical appraisal of its accuracy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 111: 57-65
        • Faschingbauer F.
        • Voigt F.
        • Goecke T.W.
        • et al.
        Fetal weight estimation in extreme macrosomia (≥ 4,500 g): comparison of 10 formulas.
        Ultraschall Med. 2012; 33: E62
        • Rosati P.
        • Arduini M.
        • Giri C.
        • et al.
        Ultrasonographic weight estimation in large for gestational age fetuses: a comparison of 17 sonographic formulas and four models algorithms.
        J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010; 23: 675
        • Cesnaite G.
        • Domza G.
        • Ramasauskaite D.
        • et al.
        The Accuracy of 22 Fetal Weight Estimation Formulas in Diabetic Pregnancies.
        Fetal Diagn Ther. 2020; 47: 54-59
        • Porter B.
        • Neely C.
        • Szychowski J.
        • et al.
        Ultrasonographic fetal weight estimation: should macrosomia-specific formulas be utilized?.
        Am J Perinatol. 2015; 32: 968-972
        • Weiss C.
        • Enengl S.
        • Enzelsberger S.H.
        • et al.
        Does the Porter formula hold its promise? A weight estimation formula for macrosomic fetuses put to the test.
        Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020; 301: 129-135
        • Aviram A.
        • Yogev Y.
        • Ashwal E.
        • et al.
        Different formulas, different thresholds and different performance-the prediction of macrosomia by ultrasound.
        J Perinatol. 2017; 37: 1285-1291
        • O'Reilly-Green C.P.
        • Divon M.Y.
        Receiver operating characteristic curves of sonographic estimated fetal weight for prediction of macrosomia in prolonged pregnancies.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 9: 403-408
        • AIUM-ACR-ACOG-SMFM-SRU
        Practice parameter for the performance of standard diagnostic obstetric ultrasound examinations.
        J Ultrasound Med. 2018; 37: E13-E24
        • Lindell G.
        • Källén K.
        • Maršál K.
        Ultrasound weight estimation of large fetuses.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012; 91: 1218-1225
        • Schaefer-Graf U.M.
        • Wendt L.
        • Sacks D.A.
        • et al.
        How many sonograms are needed to reliably predict the absence of fetal overgrowth in gestational diabetes mellitus pregnancies?.
        Diabetes Care. 2011; 34: 39
        • Kjos S.L.
        • Schaefer-Graf U.
        • Sardesi S.
        • et al.
        A randomized controlled trial using glycemic plus fetal ultrasound parameters versus glycemic parameters to determine insulin therapy in gestational diabetes with fasting hyperglycemia.
        Diabetes Care. 2001; 24: 1904
        • Mintz M.C.
        • Landon M.B.
        • Gabbe S.G.
        • et al.
        Shoulder soft tissue width as a predictor of macrosomia in diabetic pregnancies.
        Am J Perinatol. 1989; 6: 240
        • Sood A.K.
        • Yancey M.
        • Richards D.
        Prediction of fetal macrosomia using humeral soft tissue thickness.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 85: 937
        • Petrikovsky B.M.
        • Oleschuk C.
        • Lesser M.
        • et al.
        Prediction of fetal macrosomia using sonographically measured abdominal subcutaneous tissue thickness.
        J Clin Ultrasound. 1997; 25: 378
        • Santolaya-Forgas J.
        • Meyer W.J.
        • Gauthier D.W.
        • et al.
        Intrapartum fetal subcutaneous tissue/femur length ratio: an ultrasonographic clue to fetal macrosomia.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994; 171: 1072
        • Abramowicz J.S.
        • Sherer D.M.
        • Woods Jr., J.R.
        Ultrasonographic measurement of cheek-to-cheek diameter in fetal growth disturbances.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 169: 405
        • Chauhan S.P.
        • West D.J.
        • Scardo J.A.
        • et al.
        Antepartum detection of macrosomic fetus: clinical versus sonographic, including soft-tissue measurements.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 95: 639
        • Rossi A.C.
        • Vimercati A.
        • Greco P.
        • et al.
        [Echographic measurement of subcutaneous adipose tissue as fetal growth index].
        Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense. 2000; 71: 379
        • Maruotti G.M.
        • Saccone G.
        • Martinelli P.
        Third trimester ultrasound soft-tissue measurements accurately predicts macrosomia.
        J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017; 30: 972
        • Cohen B.
        • Penning S.
        • Major C.
        • et al.
        Sonographic prediction of shoulder dystocia in infants of diabetic mothers.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 88: 10-13
        • Miller R.S.
        • Devine P.C.
        • Johnson E.B.
        Sonographic fetal asymmetry predicts shoulder dystocia.
        J Ultrasound Med. 2007; 26: 1523-1528
        • Rajan P.V.
        • Chung J.H.
        • Porto M.
        • et al.
        Correlation of increased fetal asymmetry with shoulder dystocia in the nondiabetic woman with suspected macrosomia.
        J Reprod Med. 2009; 54: 478-482
        • Chauhan S.P.
        • Cowan B.D.
        • Magann E.F.
        • et al.
        Intrapartum detection of a macrosomic fetus: clinical versus 8 sonographic models.
        Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995; 35: 266-270
        • Sherman D.J.
        • Arieli S.
        • Tovbin J.
        • et al.
        A comparison of clinical and ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 91: 212-217
        • Hendrix N.W.
        • Grady C.S.
        • Chauhan S.P.
        Clinical vs. sonographic estimate of birthweight in term parturients. A randomized clinical trial.
        J Reprod Med. 2000; 45: 317-322
        • Weiner E.
        • Mizrachi Y.
        • Fainstein N.
        • et al.
        Comparison between three methods of fetal weight estimation during the active stage of labor performed by residents: a prospective cohort study.
        Fetal Diagn Ther. 2017; 42: 117-123
        • Harlev A.
        • Walfisch A.
        • Bar-David J.
        • et al.
        Maternal estimation of fetal weight as a complementary method of fetal weight assessment: a prospective clinical trial.
        J Reprod Med. 2006; 51: 515-520
        • Wiebe H.W.
        • Boule N.G.
        • Chari R.
        • et al.
        The effect of supervised prenatal exercise on fetal growth: a meta-analysis.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 125: 1185-1194
        • Davenport M.H.
        • Meah V.L.
        • Ruchat S.M.
        • et al.
        Impact of prenatal exercise on neonatal and childhood outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Br J Sports Med. 2018; 52: 1386-1396
      1. Physical activity and exercise during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Committee Opinion No. 650. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 126: e135-e142
        • Shawe J.
        • Ceulemans D.
        • Akhter Z.
        • et al.
        Pregnancy after bariatric surgery: consensus recommendations for periconception, antenatal and postnatal care.
        Obes Rev. 2019; 20: 1507-1522
        • O'Brien P.E.
        • Hindle A.
        • Brennan L.
        • et al.
        Long-term outcomes after bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of weight loss at 10 or more years for all bariatric procedures and a single-centre review of 20-year outcomes after adjustable gastric banding.
        Obes Surg. 2019; 29: 3-14
        • Yi X.Y.
        • Li Q.F.
        • Zhang J.
        • et al.
        A meta-analysis of maternal and fetal outcomes of pregnancy after bariatric surgery.
        Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015; 130: 3-9
        • Galazis N.
        • Docheva N.
        • Simillis C.
        • et al.
        Maternal and neonatal outcomes in women undergoing bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014; 181: 45-53
        • Wei J.
        • Heng W.
        • Gao J.
        Effects of low glycemic index diets on gestational diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.
        Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95: e3792
        • Muktabhant B.
        • Lawrie T.A.
        • Lumbiganon P.
        • et al.
        Diet or exercise, or both, for preventing excessive weight gain in pregnancy.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; (CD007145)
        • Ecker J.L.
        • Greenberg J.A.
        • Norwitz E.R.
        • et al.
        Birthweight as a predictor of brachial plexus injury.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 89: 643-647
        • Gherman R.B.
        • Goodwin T.M.
        • Ouzounian J.G.
        • et al.
        Brachial plexus palsy associated with cesarean section: an in utero injury?.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 177: 1162-1164
        • Gregory K.D.
        • Henry O.A.
        • Ramicone E.
        • et al.
        Maternal and infant complications in high and normal weight infants by method of delivery.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 92: 507-513
        • Barger M.K.
        • Weiss J.
        • Nannini A.
        • et al.
        Risk factors for uterine rupture among women who attempt a vaginal birth after a previous cesarean: a case-control study.
        J Reprod Med. 2011; 56: 313-320
        • Jastrow N.
        • Roberge S.
        • Gauthier R.J.
        • et al.
        Effect of birth weight on adverse obstetric outcomes in vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 115: 338-343
        • Elkousy M.A.
        • Sammel M.
        • Stevens E.
        • et al.
        The effect of birth weight on vaginal birth after cesarean delivery success rates.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 188: 824-830
        • Zelop C.M.
        • Shipp T.D.
        • Repke J.T.
        • et al.
        Outcomes of trial of labor following previous cesarean delivery among women with fetuses weighing >4000 g.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 185: 903-905
        • Combs C.A.
        • Singh N.B.
        • Khoury J.C.
        Elective induction versus spontaneous labor after sonographic diagnosis of fetal macrosomia.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 81: 492-496
        • Friesen C.D.
        • Miller A.M.
        • Rayburn W.F.
        Influence of spontaneous or induced labor on delivering the macrosomic fetus.
        Am J Perinatol. 1995; 12: 63-66
        • Leaphart W.L.
        • Meyer M.C.
        • Capeless E.L.
        Labor induction with a prenatal diagnosis of fetal macrosomia.
        J Matern Fetal Med. 1997; 6: 99-102
        • Boulvain M.
        • Senat M.V.
        • Perrotin F.
        • et al.
        Induction of labour versus expectant management for large-for-date fetuses: a randomised controlled trial. Groupe de Recherche en Obstetrique et Gynecologie, (GROG).
        Lancet. 2015; 385: 2600-2605
        • Walker K.
        • Thornton J.
        Induction of labour at 37 weeks for suspected fetal macrosomia may reduce birth trauma.
        Evid Based Med. 2017; 22: 148
        • Rozenberg P.
        En cas de macrosomie fœtale, la meilleure stratégie est le déclenchement artificiel du travail à 38 semaines d’aménorrhée [In case of fetal macrosomia, the best strategy is the induction of labor at 38 weeks of gestation].
        J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2016; 45: 1037-1044
        • Cheng Y.W.
        • Sparks T.N.
        • Laros RKJr
        • et al.
        Impending macrosomia: will induction of labour modify the risk of caesarean delivery?.
        BJOG. 2012; 119: 402-409
        • Vendittelli F.
        • Riviere O.
        • Neveu B.
        • et al.
        • Audipog Sentinel Network
        Does induction of labor for constitutionally large-for-gestational-age fetuses identified in utero reduce maternal morbidity?.
        BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014; 14: 15-156
        • Grobman W.A.
        • Miller D.
        • Burke C.
        • et al.
        Outcomes associated with introduction of a shoulder dystocia protocol.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 205: 513-517
        • Inglis S.R.
        • Feier N.
        • Chetiyaar J.B.
        • et al.
        Effects of shoulder dystocia training on the incidence of brachial plexus injury.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 204: 322.e1-6
        • Benedetti T.J.
        • Gabbe S.G.
        Shoulder dystocia. A complication of fetal macrosomia and prolonged second stage of labor with midpelvic delivery.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1978; 52: 526-529
        • Gherman R.
        • Ouzounian J.G.
        American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Shoulder dystocia. Practice Bulletin no. 178.
        ACOG, Washington, DC2017
        • Davis D.D.
        • Roshan A.
        • Canela C.D.
        • et al.
        Shoulder dystocia.
        in: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL)2020: 1-8 (Available at:) (Accessed January 24, 2021)
        • Gherman R.
        • Ouzounian J.G.
        • Grobman W.
        • et al.
        Neonatal brachial plexus palsy.
        American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC2014
        • Ahn E.S.
        • Jung M.S.
        • Lee Y.K.
        • et al.
        Neonatal clavicular fracture: recent 10 year study.
        Pediatr Int. 2015; 57 (Level II-3): 60-63
        • Perlow J.H.
        • Wigton T.
        • Hart J.
        • et al.
        Birth trauma. A five-year review of incidence and associated perinatal factors.
        J Reprod Med. 1996; 41: 754-760
        • Baskett T.F.
        • Allen A.C.
        Perinatal implications of shoulder dystocia.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 86: 14-17
        • Ouzounian J.G.
        • Gherman R.B.
        • Chauhan S.
        • et al.
        Recurrent shoulder dystocia: analysis of incidence and risk factors.
        Am J Perinatol. 2012; 29: 515-518
        • Smith R.B.
        • Lane C.
        • Pearson J.F.
        Shoulder dystocia: what happens at the next delivery?.
        Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994; 101: 713-715
        • Ginsberg N.A.
        • Moisidis C.
        How to predict recurrent shoulder dystocia.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 184 ([discussion: 1429–30]): 1427-1429
        • Lewis D.F.
        • Raymond R.C.
        • Perkins M.B.
        • et al.
        Recurrence rate of shoulder dystocia.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 172: 1369-1371