Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 22, ISSUE 4, P801-805, December 1995

MYOMAS AND PREGNANCY

      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      SUMMARY

      At this time, the growth of uterine myomas during pregnancy cannot be predicted. Major complications of pregnancy appear to be related to whether the placenta and the myoma are in contact. The location and number of myomas, especially in the lower uterine segment, increases the likelihood of cesarean birth and malpresentation. Frequent ultrasound evaluations to monitor fetal growth and presentation and the size of the myoma should be considered in pregnant women with uterine myomas. Surgical resection of myomas should be reserved for those pregnant women with symptomatic pedunculated myomas with a small stalk. In those women with a pregnancy complication owing to the myoma, resection should be considered prior to the next pregnancy.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Barber HRK Graber EA Surgical Disease in Pregnancy. WB Saunders, Philadelphia1974: 383
        • Burton C
        • Grimes DA
        • March CM
        Surgical management of leiomyomata during pregnancy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 74: 707
        • Buttery BW
        Spontaneous haemopoeritoneum complicating uterine fibromyoma.
        Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1972; 12: 210
        • Davis JL
        • Ray-Mazumder S
        • Hobel CJ
        • et al.
        Uterine leiomyomas in pregnancy: A prospective study.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 75: 41
        • Dees HC
        Cervical pregnancy associated with uterine leiomyomas.
        South Med J. 1966; 59: 900
        • Dildy GA
        • Moise KJ
        • Smith LG
        • et al.
        Indomethacin for the treatment of symptomatic leiomyomas uteri during pregnancy.
        Am J Perinatal. 1992; 98: 185
      2. Douglas RG Stromme WB Operative Obstetrics. ed 4. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York1982: 289
        • Exacoutos C
        • Rosati P
        Ultrasound diagnosis of uterine myomas and complications in pregnancy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 82: 97
        • Faulkner RL
        Red degeneration of uterine myomas.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1947; 53: 474
        • Gebhard C
        Veit’s Handbuch der Gynäk. 1899; 2: 439
        • Glueck H
        • Burket RL
        • Sutherland JM
        • et al.
        Afibrinogenemia in pregnancy apparently due to a degenerating leiomyoma.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1961; 18: 285
        • Goldberg KA
        • Kwart AM
        Intermittent urinary retention in first trimester of pregnancy.
        Urology. 1981; 17: 270
        • Graham JM
        • Miller ME
        • Stephan MJ
        • Smith DW
        Limb reduction anomalies and early in utero limb compression.
        J Pediatr. 1980; 96: 1052
        • Hasan F
        • Arumugam K
        • Sivanesaratnam V
        Uterine leiomyomas in pregnancy.
        Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1990; 34: 45
        • Heffernan LPM
        • Fraser RC
        • Purdy RA
        L-5 radiculopathy secondary to a uterine leiomyoma in a primigravid patient.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980; 138: 160
        • Hepperlin HM
        Ectopic pregnancy associated with fibromyoma.
        Nebr Med J. 1970; 55: 428
        • Hnat RF
        • Anderson GG
        • Alonzo DR
        Diffuse intravascular coagulation associated with a degenerating myoma in pregnancy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1967; 29: 207
        • Katz VL
        • Dotters DJ
        • Droegemueller W
        Complications of uterine leiomyomas in pregnancy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 73: 593
        • Kessler A
        • Mitchell DG
        • Kuhlman K
        • et al.
        Myomas vs. contraction in pregnancy: Differentiation with color Doppler imaging.
        Journal of Clinical Ultrasound. 1993; 21: 241
        • Lev-Toaff AS
        • Coleman GB
        • Arger PH
        • et al.
        Leiomyomas in pregnancy: Sonographic study.
        Radiology. 1987; 164: 375
        • Moise KJ
        Ultrasound diagnosis of uterine myomas and complications in pregnancy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 82: 881
        • Muram D
        • Gillieson M
        • Walters JH
        Myomas of uterus in pregnancy: Ultrasonographic follow up.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980; 138: 16
        • Rice JP
        • Kay HH
        • Mahony BS
        The clinical significance of uterine leiomyomas during pregnancy.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 160: 1212
        • Romero R
        • Chervenak FA
        • DeVane G
        • et al.
        Fetal head deformation and congenital torticollis associated with a uterine tumor.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981; 141: 839
        • Telko M
        • Powlony M
        • Pawlicka H
        Diagnosis and therapy of puerperal eversion of myomatoces uterus.
        Ginekol. Pol. 1973; 44: 699
        • Treissman DA
        • Bate JT
        • Randall PT
        Epidural use of morphine in managing the pain of carneous degeneration of a uterine leiomyoma during pregnancy.
        Journal of Canadian Medical Association. 1982; 126: 505
      3. Cunningham FG MacDonald PC Gant NF Williams Obstetrics. ed 19. Appleton-Lange, Norwalk1993: 533
        • Winer-Muram HT
        • Muram D
        • Gillieson MS
        Uterine myomas in pregnancy.
        Journal of the Association of Canadian Radiologists. 1984; 35: 168