Advertisement

Robotic Surgery

Advancements and Inflection Points in the Field of Gynecology

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Advincula
        • Arnold P.
        • Song A.
        The role of robotic surgery in gynecology.
        Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 19: 331-336
        • Intuitive Surgical Inc
        Annual report 2018.
        in: Annu rep. 2018: 122 (Available at:)
        • Wright J.D.
        • Ananth C.V.
        • Lewin S.N.
        • et al.
        Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease.
        JAMA. 2013; 309: 689-698
        • Lee S.
        • Kim M.-R.
        • Seong S.J.
        • et al.
        Trends in robotic surgery in Korean gynecology.
        Gynecol Robot Surg. 2020; 1: 50-56
        • Nicklin J.
        The future of robotic-assisted laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery in Australia – a time and a place for everything.
        Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017; 57: 493-498
        • Intuitive Surgical Inc
        Annual report 2019.
        (Available at:) (Accessed February 8, 2021)
        • Varghese A.
        • Doglioli M.
        • Fader A.N.
        Updates and controversies of robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic surgery.
        Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 62: 733-748
        • Jayakumaran J.
        • Wiercinski K.
        • Buffington C.
        • et al.
        Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site benign gynecologic surgery: a single-center experience.
        J Robot Surg. 2018; 12: 447-454
        • Scheib S.A.
        • Fader A.N.
        Gynecologic robotic laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: prospective analysis of feasibility, safety, and technique.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 212: 179.e1-179.e8
        • Khandalavala K.
        • Shimon T.
        • Flores L.
        • et al.
        Emerging surgical robotic technology: a progression toward microbots.
        Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg. 2020; 5: 1-8
        • Longmore S.K.
        • Naik G.
        • Gargiulo G.D.
        Laparoscopic robotic surgery: current perspective and future directions.
        Robotics. 2020; 9: 1-22
      1. Hale C. Medtronic takes its new surgery robot out for a spin with investor debut. Fierce Biotech. Available at: https://www.fiercebiotech.com/medtech/first-look-medtronic-takes-its-new-surgery-robot-out-for-a-spin. Accessed February 1, 2021.

        • Sean W.
        Breaking: Johnson & Johnson finally unveils its new robot-assisted surgery system.
        MassDevice. 2020; (Accessed January 24, 2021)
        • Montlouis-Calixte J.
        • Ripamonti B.
        • Barabino G.
        • et al.
        Senhance 3-mm robot-assisted surgery: experience on first 14 patients in France.
        J Robot Surg. 2019; 13: 643-647
        • Samalavicius N.E.
        • Janusonis V.
        • Siaulys R.
        • et al.
        Robotic surgery using Senhance® robotic platform: single center experience with first 100 cases.
        J Robot Surg. 2020; 14: 371-376
        • Park A.
        • Lee G.
        • Seagull F.J.
        • et al.
        Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: an impending epidemic.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2010; 210: 306-313
        • Meltzer A.J.
        • Susan Hallbeck M.
        • Melissa M.
        • et al.
        Measuring ergonomic risk in operating surgeons by using wearable technology.
        JAMA Surg. 2020; 155: 444-446
        • Franasiak J.
        • Ko E.M.
        • Kidd J.
        • et al.
        Physical strain and urgent need for ergonomic training among gynecologic oncologists who perform minimally invasive surgery.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2012; 126: 437-442
        • Lawson E.H.
        • Curet M.J.
        • Sanchez B.R.
        • et al.
        Postural ergonomics during robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: a pilot project.
        J Robot Surg. 2007; 1: 61-67
        • Craven R.
        • Franasiak J.
        • Mosaly P.
        • et al.
        Ergonomic deficits in robotic gynecologic oncology surgery: a need for intervention.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013; 20: 648-655
        • McDonald M.E.
        • Ramirez P.T.
        • Munsell M.F.
        • et al.
        Physician pain and discomfort during minimally invasive gynecologic cancer surgery.
        Gynecol Oncol. 2014; 134: 243-247
        • Hokenstad E.D.
        • Hallbeck M.S.
        • Lowndes B.R.
        • et al.
        Ergonomic robotic console configuration in gynecologic surgery: an interventional study.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2020.07.017
        • Wee I.J.Y.
        • Kuo L.J.
        • Ngu J.C.Y.
        A systematic review of the true benefit of robotic surgery: ergonomics.
        Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg. 2020; 16: e2113
        • Catanzarite T.
        • Tan-Kim J.
        • Menefee S.A.
        Ergonomics in gynecologic surgery.
        Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 30: 432-440
        • Lee M.R.
        • Lee G.I.
        Does a robotic surgery approach offer optimal ergonomics to gynecologic surgeons?: a comprehensive ergonomics survey study in gynecologic robotic surgery.
        J Gynecol Oncol. 2017; 28: 70
        • Lux M.M.
        • Marshall M.
        • Erturk E.
        • et al.
        Ergonomic evaluation and guidelines for use of the daVinci robot system.
        J Endourol. 2010; 24: 371-375
        • Schwab K.
        • Smith R.
        • Brown V.
        • et al.
        Evolution of stereoscopic imaging in surgery and recent advances.
        World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2017; 9: 368-377
        • Gueli Alletti S.
        • Rossitto C.
        • Cianci S.
        • et al.
        The SenhanceTM surgical robotic system (“Senhance”) for total hysterectomy in obese patients: a pilot study.
        J Robot Surg. 2018; 12: 229-234
        • Hutchins A.R.
        • Manson R.J.
        • Lerebours R.
        • et al.
        Objective assessment of the early stages of the learning curve for the senhance surgical robotic system.
        J Surg Educ. 2019; 76: 201-214
        • Barrera K.
        • Wang D.
        • Sugiyama G.
        Robotic assisted single site surgery: a decade of innovation.
        Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg. 2020; 5: 4
        • Esther S.H.
        Tech update: single port robot-assisted laparoscopic gynecologic surgery.
        AAGL NewsScope. 2020; 34 (Available at:)
        • Misal M.
        • Magtibay P.M.
        • Yi J.
        Robotic less and reduced-port hysterectomy using the da Vinci SP surgical system: a single-institution case series..
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021; 28: 1095-1100
        • Shin H.J.
        • Yoo H.K.
        • Lee J.H.
        • et al.
        Robotic single-port surgery using the da Vinci SP® surgical system for benign gynecologic disease: a preliminary report.
        Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 59: 243-247
      2. Intuitive Systems - da Vinci SP.
        (Available at:) (Accessed January 18, 2021)
        • Seeliger B.
        • Diana M.
        • Ruurda J.P.
        • et al.
        Enabling single-site laparoscopy: the SPORT platform.
        Surg Endosc. 2019; 33: 3696-3703
      3. Discover Enos Technology.
        (Available at:) (Accessed January 18, 2021)
        • Khorgami Z.
        • Li W.T.
        • Jackson T.N.
        • et al.
        The cost of robotics: an analysis of the added costs of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery using the National Inpatient Sample.
        Surg Endosc. 2019; 33: 2217-2221
        • Wright K.N.
        • Jonsdottir G.M.
        • Jorgensen S.
        • et al.
        Costs and outcomes of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies.
        J Soc Laparoendosc Surg. 2012; 16: 519-524
        • Paraiso M.F.R.
        • Ridgeway B.
        • Park A.J.
        • et al.
        A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 208: 368.e1-368.e7
        • Moawad G.N.
        • Abi Khalil E.D.
        • Tyan P.
        • et al.
        Comparison of cost and operative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy across different uterine weights.
        J Robot Surg. 2017; 11: 433-439
        • Klebanoff J.S.
        • Tyan P.
        • Nishikawa M.
        • et al.
        Cost variance across obesity class for women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy by high-volume gynecologic surgeons.
        J Robot Surg. 2020; 14: 903-907
        • Lim P.C.
        • Crane J.T.
        • English E.J.
        • et al.
        Multicenter analysis comparing robotic, open, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomies performed by high-volume surgeons for benign indications.
        Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2016; 133: 359-364
        • Huffman E.M.
        • Rosen S.A.
        • Levy J.S.
        • et al.
        Are current credentialing requirements for robotic surgery adequate to ensure surgeon proficiency?.
        Surg Endosc. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07608-2
        • Siddique M.
        • Shah N.
        • Park A.
        • et al.
        Core privileging and credentialing: hospitals’ approach to gynecologic surgery.
        J Minimally Invasive Gynecol. 2016; 23: 1088-1106.e1
        • Sheetz K.H.
        • Dimick J.B.
        Is it time for safeguards in the adoption of robotic surgery? HHS Public Access.
        JAMA. 2019; 321: 1971-1972
        • FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health
        Final report: da Vinci surgical system.
        2013 (Available at:)
        • Advancing A.
        • Invasive M.
        • Worldwide G.
        Guidelines for privileging for robotic-assisted gynecologic laparoscopy.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014; 21: 157-167
        • American Urological Association
        Robotic surgery (urologic) standard operating procedure (SOP).
        (Available at:) (Accessed January 23, 2021)
        • Herron D.M.
        • Marohn M.
        • Advincula A.
        • et al.
        A consensus document on robotic surgery.
        Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech. 2008; 22: 313-325
        • Stefanidis D.
        • Fanelli R.D.
        • Price R.
        • et al.
        SAGES guidelines for the introduction of new technology and techniques.
        Surg Endosc. 2014; 28: 2257-2271
        • Stefanidis D.
        • Huffman E.M.
        • Collins J.W.
        • et al.
        Expert consensus recommendations for robotic surgery credentialing.
        Ann Surg. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000004531
        • Pernar L.I.M.
        • Robertson F.C.
        • Tavakkoli A.
        • et al.
        An appraisal of the learning curve in robotic general surgery.
        Surg Endosc. 2017; 31: 4583-4596
        • AAGL
        Guidelines for privileging for robotic-assisted gynecologic laparoscopy.
        J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014; 21: 157-167
        • American Urological Association
        Robotic surgery (urologic) standard operating procedure (SOP).
        (Available at:) (Accessed January 23, 2021)
        • Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons
        The definitions document: a reference for use of SAGES guidelines.
        2009 (Available at:)