Advertisement

Challenges in Breast Evaluation

Breast Asymmetry, Macromastia, and the Surgically Altered Breast

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Rohrich R.J.
        • Hartley W.
        • Brown S.
        Incidence of breast and chest wall asymmetry in breast augmentation: a retrospective analysis of 100 patients.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 118: 7S-13S
        • Nuzzi L.C.
        • Firriolo J.M.
        • Pike C.M.
        • et al.
        The effect of surgical treatment on the quality of life of young women with breast asymmetry: a longitudinal, cohort study.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020; 146: 400e-408e
        • Kulkarni D.
        • Dixon J.M.
        Congenital abnormalities of the breast.
        Women's Health (Lond). 2012; 8: 75-88
        • van Aalst J.A.
        • Phillips J.D.
        • Sadove A.M.
        Pediatric chest wall and breast deformities.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 38e-49e
        • Nuzzi L.C.
        • Pramanick T.
        • Walsh L.R.
        • et al.
        Optimal timing for reduction mammaplasty in adolescents.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020; 146: 1213-1220
        • Bonde C.
        • Sillesen N.
        • Holmich L.
        • et al.
        LOP17.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012; 130: 483
        • Han S.
        • Gi Hong Y.
        The inverted nipple: its grading and surgical correction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999; 104: 389-395
        • Jabs A.D.
        • Frantz A.G.
        • Smith-Vaniz A.
        • et al.
        Mammary hypertrophy is not associated with increased estrogen receptors.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990; 86: 64-66
        • Bames H.O.
        Reduction of massive breast hypertrophy.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1948; 3: 560-569
        • Boukovalas S.
        • Boson A.L.
        • Padilla P.L.
        • et al.
        Insurance denials in reduction mammaplasty: how can we serve our patients better?.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020; 146: 127e-136e
        • Sears E.D.
        • Lu Y.
        • Swiatek P.R.
        • et al.
        Use of preoperative mammography during evaluation for nononcologic breast reduction surgery.
        JAMA Surg. 2019; 154: 356-358
        • Ortiz-Pomales Y.T.
        • Priyanka H.
        • Newell M.S.
        • et al.
        Reduction mammaplasty and breast cancer screening.
        Clin Plast Surg. 2016; 43: 333-339
        • Clark C.J.
        • Whang S.
        • Paige K.T.
        Incidence of precancerous lesions in breast reduction tissue: a pathologic review of 562 consecutive patients.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 124: 1033-1039
        • Cruz-Korchin N.
        • Korchin L.
        • González-Keelan C.
        • et al.
        Macromastia: how much of it is fat?.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002; 109: 64-68
        • Rohrich R.J.
        • Kaplan J.
        • Dayan E.
        Silicone implant illness: science versus myth?.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 144: 98-190
        • Kern K.A.
        • Flannery J.T.
        • Kuehn P.G.
        Carcinogenic potential of silicone breast implants: a Connecticut statewide study.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997; 100: 737-747
        • U.S. Food and Drug Administration
        Certain labeling recommendations to improve patient communication.
        Medical Devices, Rockville, MD2020
        • Carr L.W.
        • Roberts J.
        • Mericli A.F.
        • et al.
        Breast implant imaging surveillance among U.S. plastic surgeons: U.S. Food and Drug Administration recommendations versus clinical reality.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020; 145: 1381-1387
        • Stachs A.
        • Dieterich M.
        • Hartmann S.
        • et al.
        Diagnosis of ruptured breast implants through high-resolution ultrasound combined with real-time elastography.
        Aesthet Surg J. 2015; 35: 410-418
        • Hidalgo D.A.
        • Weinstein A.L.
        Surgical treatment for capsular contracture: a new paradigm and algorithm.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020; 146: 516-525
        • Calobrace M.B.
        • Stevens W.G.
        • Capizzi P.J.
        • et al.
        Risk factor analysis for capsular contracture: a 10-year Sientra study using round, smooth, and textured implants for breast augmentation.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018; 141: 20S-28S
        • Kim J.Y.S.
        • Qiu C.
        • Chiu W.K.
        • et al.
        A quantitative analysis of animation deformity in prosthetic breast reconstruction.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 144: 291-301
        • Collett D.J.
        • Rakhorst H.
        • Lennox P.
        • et al.
        Current risk estimate of breast implant–associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma in textured breast implants.
        Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 143: 30S-40S