Advertisement

Shoulder Dystocia

Challenging Basic Assumptions

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Gherman R.B.
        • Chauhan S.P.
        • Lewis D.F.
        Shoulder dystocia: A survey of Central Association Members about its definition, management, and complications.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 119: 83-87
        • Wood C.
        • Ng K.H.
        • Hounslow D.
        Time: an important variable in normal delivery.
        J Obstet Gynecol Br Commonw. 1973; 80: 295-300
        • Stallings S.P.
        • Edwards R.K.
        • Johsnon J.W.C.
        Correlation of head-to-body delivery intervals in shoulder dystocia and umbilical artery acidosis.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 185: 268-274
        • Allen R.H.
        • Rosenbaum T.C.
        • Ghidini A.
        • et al.
        Correlating head-to-body delivery intervals with neonatal depression in vaginal births that result in permanent brachial plexus injury.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 187: 839-842https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.127128
        • Locatelli A.
        • Incerti M.
        • Ghidini A.
        • et al.
        Head-to-body delivery interval using “two step” approach in vaginal deliveries: Effect on umbilical artery pH.
        J Maternal-fetal Med Neonatal Med. 2011; 24: 799-808
        • Zhang H.
        • Zhao N.
        • Lu Y.
        • et al.
        Two-step shoulder delivery method reduces the incidence of shoulder dystocia.
        Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 44: 347-435
        • Spong C.Y.
        • Beall M.
        • Rodrigues D.
        • et al.
        An objective definition of shoulder dystocia: Prolonged head-to-body delivery intervals and/or the use of ancillary obstetric maneuvers.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 86: 433-436
        • Beall M.H.
        • Spong C.
        • McKay J.
        • et al.
        Objective definition of shoulder dystocia: A prospective evaluation.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 179: 934-937
        • Kilpatrick S.
        • Garrison E.
        Normal labor and delivery.
        in: Gabbe S.G. Niebyl J.R. Simpson J.L. Obstetrics: normal and Problem pregnancies. 5th edition. Churchill Livingstone, 2007: 303-321
        • Cunningham F.G.
        • Gant N.F.
        • Leveno K.J.
        • et al.
        Conduct of normal labor and delivery.
        Williams Obstetrics 21st edition. Mc-Graw HIill, 2001: 309-329
      1. ACOG practice patterns. Shoulder dystocia. Number 7, October 1997. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
        Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1998; 60: 306-313
        • ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology
        The American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 40, November 2002.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 100: 1045-1050https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02513-9
      2. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. RCOG Guideline No. 42. 2005. Dec.

        • Chauhan S.P.
        • Gherman R.
        • Hendrix N.W.
        • et al.
        Shoulder dystocia: Comparison of the ACOG practice bulletin with another national guideline.
        Am J Perinatol. 2010; 27: 129-136
      3. Royal College of OB/GYN Guideline Number 42 (2nd edition). Shoulder dystocia. March 2012.

      4. Practice Bulletin No 178: Shoulder Dystocia.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 129: e123-e133https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002043
        • Walters M.
        • EubanksA
        • Weissbrod E.
        • et al.
        Visual estimation of force applied during simulated deliveries complicated by shoulder dystocia.
        Am J Perinatol Rep. 2018; 8: e206-e2011
        • Ankumah N.E.
        • Chauhan V.B.
        • Pedroza C.
        • et al.
        Angles, traction, and time after delivery of fetal head: Interobserver variation of novel visual analogs.
        Am J Perinatol. 2017; 34: 1424-1514
        • Dunbar D.C.
        • Vilensky J.A.
        • Suárez-Quian C.A.
        • et al.
        Risk factors for neonatal brachial plexus palsy attributed to anatomy, physiology, and evolution.
        Clin Anat. 2021; 34: 884-898https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23739
      5. Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy. acog.org.
        (Available at)
        • Grimm M.J.
        Maternal endogenous forces and shoulder dystocia.
        Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 59: 820-829
        • Wagner S.M.
        • Bell C.S.
        • Gupta M.
        • et al.
        Interventions to decrease complications after shoulder dystocia: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 225: 484-493
        • Iskender C.
        • Kaymak O.
        • Erkenekli K.
        • et al.
        Neonatal injury at cephalic vaginal delivery: A retrospective analysis of extent of association with shoulder dystocia.
        PLOS One. 2014; 9: 1-6
        • Wall L.B.
        • Mills J.K.
        • Leveno K.
        • et al.
        Incidence and prognosis of neonatal brachial plexus palsy with and without clavicular fractures.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123: 1288-1293
        • Gandhi R.A.
        • DeFrancesco C.J.
        • Shah A.S.
        The association of clavicle fracture with brachial plexus palsy.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2018; 1: e1-e6
        • McLaren R.A.
        • Chang K.W.
        • Ankuma N.A.
        • et al.
        Persistence of neonatal brachial plexus palsy among nulliparous versus parous women.
        Am J Perinatol Rep. 2019; 9: 1-5
        • Spain J.E.
        • Frey H.A.
        • Tuuli M.G.
        • et al.
        Neonatal morbidity associated with shoulder dystocia maneuvers.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 212: e1-e5
        • Doty M.S.
        • Chauhan S.P.
        • Chang K.W.
        • et al.
        Persistence and extent of neonatal brachial plexus palsy: Association with number of maneuvers and duration of shoulder.
        Am J Perinatol Rep. 2020; 10: e42-e48
        • Mehta S.H.
        • Blackwell S.C.
        • Bujold E.
        • et al.
        What factors are associated with neonatal injury following shoulder dystocia?.
        J Perinatol. 2006; 26: 85-88
        • Hoffman M.K.
        • Bailit J.L.
        • Branch D.W.
        • et al.
        A comparison of obstetric maneuvers for the acute management of shoulder dystocia.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117: 1272-1278
        • Moragianni V.A.
        • Hacker M.R.
        • Craparo F.J.
        The impact of length of second stage of labor on shoulder dystocia outcomes: a retrospective cohort study.
        J Perinat Med. 2012; 40: 463-465
        • Gherman R.B.
        • Ouzounian J.G.
        • Satin A.J.
        • et al.
        A comparison of shoulder dystocia-associated transient and permanent brachial plexus palsies.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 102: 544-548
        • Mollberg M.
        • Lagerkvist A.L.
        • Johansson U.
        • et al.
        Comparison in obstetric management on infants with transient and persistent obstetric brachial plexus palsy.
        J Child Neurol. 2008; 23: 1424-1432
        • Wilson T.J.
        • Chang K.W.
        • Chauhan S.P.
        • et al.
        Peripartum and neonatal factors associated with the persistence of neonatal brachial plexus palsy at one year: A review of 382 cases.
        J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016; 17: 618-624
        • Pondaag W.
        • Allen R.H.
        • Malessy M.J.A.
        Correlating birthweight with neurological severity of obstetric brachial plexus lesions.
        BJOG. 2011; 118: 1098-1103
        • Chauhan S.P.
        • Rose C.H.
        • Gherman R.B.
        • et al.
        Brachial plexus injury: a 23-year experience from a tertiary center.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 192: 1795-1800
        • Chang K.W.
        • Ankumah N.A.
        • Wilson T.J.
        • et al.
        Persistence of Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy Associated with Maternally Reported Route of Delivery: Review of 387 Cases.
        Am J Perinatol. 2016; 33: 765-769
      6. Macrosomia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 216.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 135: e18-e35
        • Chauhan S.P.
        • Grobman W.A.
        • Gherman R.A.
        • et al.
        Suspicion and treatment of the macrosomic fetus: a review.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 193: 332-346
        • Narendran L.M.
        • Mendez-Figueroa H.
        • Chauhan S.P.
        • et al.
        Predictors of neonatal brachial plexus palsy subsequent to resolution of shoulder dystocia.
        J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021; : 1-7
        • Rouse D.J.
        • Owen J.
        • Goldenberg R.L.
        • et al.
        The effectiveness and costs of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound.
        JAMA. 1996; 276: 1480-1486
        • Heywood R.E.
        • Magann E.F.
        • Rich D.L.
        • et al.
        The detection of macrosomia at a teaching hospital.
        Am J Perinatol. 2009; 26: 165-168
        • Chauhan S.P.
        • Hendrix N.W.
        • Magann E.F.
        • et al.
        A review of sonographic estimate of fetal weight: vagaries of accuracy.
        J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005; 18: 211-220
        • Bicocca M.J.
        • Le T.N.
        • Zhang C.C.
        • et al.
        Identification of newborns with birthweight ≥ 4,500g: Ultrasound within one- vs. two weeks of delivery.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020; 249: 47-53
        • Doty M.S.
        • Al-Hafez L.
        • Chauhan S.P.
        Sonographic Examination of The Fetus Vis-à-Vis Shoulder Dystocia: A Vexing Promise.
        Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 59: 795-802
        • Bingham J.
        • Chauhan S.P.
        • Hayes E.
        • et al.
        Recurrent shoulder dystocia: a review.
        Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2010; 65: 183-188
      7. Recurrent shoulder dystocia: risk factors and counselling.
        Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 59: 803-812
        • Chauhan R.S.
        • Chauhan S.P.
        Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board: a paradigm shift.
        BJOG. 2017; 124: 1152
        • Wagner S.M.
        • Bell C.S.
        • Gupta M.
        • et al.
        Interventions to decrease complications after shoulder dystocia: a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 225: 484.e1-484.e33
        • Gurewitsch Allen E.D.
        • Will S.E.
        • Allen R.H.
        • et al.
        Improving shoulder dystocia management and outcomes with a targeted quality assurance program.
        Am J Perinatol. 2017; 34: 1088-1096
        • Crofts J.F.
        • Lenguerrand E.
        • Bentham G.L.
        • et al.
        Prevention of brachial plexus injury-12 years of shoulder dystocia training: an interrupted time-series study.
        BJOG. 2016; 123: 111-118
        • Walsh J.M.
        • Kandamany N.
        • Ni Shuibhne N.
        • et al.
        Neonatal brachial plexus injury: comparison of incidence and antecedents between 2 decades.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 204: 324.e1-6