Advertisement

Surgical Burden of Disease in Women

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribers receive full online access to your subscription and archive of back issues up to and including 2002.

      Content published before 2002 is available via pay-per-view purchase only.

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Meara J.G.
        • Dr Leather
        • Andrew J.M.
        • et al.
        Global surgery 2030: Evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development.
        The Lancet (British edition). 2015; 386 (Available at:): 569-624
      1. United Nations. Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. . 2015.

        • Weiser T.G.
        • Haynes A.B.
        • Molina G.
        • et al.
        Size and distribution of the global volume of surgery in 2012.
        Bull World Health Organ. 2016; 94 (Available at:): 201-209F
        • Molina G M.D.
        • Esquivel M.M.
        • Uribe-Leitz T.
        • et al.
        Avoidable maternal and neonatal deaths associated with improving access to caesarean delivery in countries with low caesarean delivery rates: An ecological modelling analysis.
        The Lancet. 2015; 385 (Available at:): S33
        • Betran A.P.
        • Ye J.
        • Moller A.
        • et al.
        Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: Global and regional estimates.
        BMJ Glob Health. 2021; 6: e005671
        • Boerma T.
        • Ronsmans C.
        • Melesse D.Y.
        • et al.
        Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections.
        The Lancet. 2018; 392: 1341-1348
        • Cavallaro F.L.
        • Cresswell J.A.
        • Ronsmans C.
        Obstetricians’ opinions of the optimal caesarean rate: A global survey.
        PloS one. 2016; 11 (Available at:): e0152779
        • Betran A.P.
        • Torloni M.R.
        • Zhang J.
        • et al.
        What is the optimal rate of caesarean section at population level? A systematic review of ecologic studies.
        Reprod Health. 2015; 12 (Available at:): 57
        • Ye J.
        • Betrán A.P.
        • Guerrero Vela M.
        • et al.
        Searching for the optimal rate of medically necessary cesarean delivery.
        Birth (Berkeley, Calif.). 2014; 41 (Available at:): 237-244
        • Betran A.
        • Torloni M.
        • Zhang J.
        • et al.
        WHO statement on caesarean section rates.
        BJOG. 2016; 123 (Available at:): 667-670
        • Molina G.
        • Weiser T.G.
        • Lipsitz S.R.
        • et al.
        Relationship between cesarean delivery rate and maternal and neonatal mortality.
        JAMA. 2015; 314: 2263-2270
        • Khan M.N.
        • Kabir M.A.
        • Shariff A.A.
        • et al.
        Too many yet too few caesarean section deliveries in bangladesh: Evidence from bangladesh demographic and health surveys data.
        PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022; 2
        • Betrán A.P.
        • Temmerman M.
        • Kingdon C.
        • et al.
        Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies.
        The Lancet. 2018; 392: 1358-1368
        • Opiyo N.
        • Kingdon C.
        • Oladapo O.T.
        • et al.
        Non-clinical interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections: WHO recommendations.
        Bull World Health Organ. 2020; 98 (Available at:): 66-68
        • Sway A.
        • Nthumba P.
        • Solomkin J.
        • et al.
        Burden of surgical site infection following cesarean section in sub-saharan africa: A narrative review.
        Int J Women's Health. 2019; 11 (Available at:): 309-318
      2. World Health Organization, Global Guidelines for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, Second Edition. patent CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. 2018. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/global-guidelines-for-the-prevention-of-surgical-site-infection-2nd-ed. Accessed March 2022

        • Sobhy S.
        • Arroyo-Manzano D.
        • Murugesu N.
        • et al.
        Maternal and perinatal mortality and complications associated with caesarean section in low-income and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        The Lancet. 2019; 393: 1973-1982
        • Ndonga A.K.N.
        • Samateh A.L.
        • Esterhuizen T.M.
        • et al.
        Maternal and neonatal outcomes after caesarean delivery in the african surgical outcomes study: A 7-day prospective observational cohort study.
        Lancet Glob Health. 2019; 7: e513-e522
        • Maswime S.
        • Buchmann E.J.
        Why women bleed and how they are saved: A cross-sectional study of caesarean section near-miss morbidity.
        BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2017; 17 (Available at:): 15
        • Buchmann E.
        • Maswime T.S.
        Near-miss maternal morbidity from severe haemorrhage at caesarean section : A process and structure audit of system deficiencies in south africa.
        SAMJ: South Afr Med J. 2017; 107 (Available at:): 1005-1009
      3. World Health Organization. Obstetric fistula.
        (Available at:) (Accessed March 22, 2022)
      4. Fistula Care Plus. Iatrogenic fistula.
        (Available at:) (Accessed March 22, 2022)
      5. Fistula Care Plus. Obstetric fistula.
        (Available at:) (Accessed March 22, 2022)
        • Bray F.
        • Laversanne M.
        • Weiderpass E.
        • et al.
        The ever-increasing importance of cancer as a leading cause of premature death worldwide.
        Cancer. 2021; 127 (Available at:): 3029-3030
        • Gelband H.
        • Jha P.
        • Sankaranarayanan R.
        • et al.
        3rd edition. Disease control priorities. vol. 3. World Bank Publications, Washington2015 (Available at:)
        • Joko-Fru W.Y.
        • Jedy-Agba E.
        • Korir A.
        • et al.
        The evolving epidemic of breast cancer in sub-Saharan africa: Results from the african cancer registry network.
        Int J Cancer. 2020; 147 (Available at:): 2131-2141
        • Bray F.
        • McCarron P.
        • Parkin D.M.
        The changing global patterns of female breast cancer incidence and mortality.
        Breast Cancer Res. 2004; 6 (Available at:): 229-239
        • Heer E.
        • Harper A.
        • Escandor N.
        • et al.
        Global burden and trends in premenopausal and postmenopausal breast cancer: A population-based study.
        Lancet Glob Health. 2020; 8 (Available at:): e1027-e1037
        • Gordon C.S.
        • Samateh A.L.
        • Tumukunde J.T.
        • et al.
        Perioperative patient outcomes in the african surgical outcomes study: A 7-day prospective observational cohort study.
        The Lancet. 2018; 391: 1589-1598
        • Rosen M.A.
        • DiazGranados D.
        • Dietz A.S.
        • et al.
        Teamwork in healthcare: Key discoveries enabling safer, high-quality care.
        Am Psychol. 2018; 73 (Available at:): 433-450
        • Gawande A.A.
        • Zinner M.J.
        • Studdert D.M.
        • et al.
        Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals.
        Surgery. 2003; 133: 614-621
        • Yule S.
        • Flin R.
        • Paterson-Brown S.
        • et al.
        Development of a rating system for surgeons' non-technical skills.
        Med Educ. 2006; 40 (Available at:): 1098-1104
        • Christian C.K.
        • Gustafson M.L.
        • Roth E.M.
        • et al.
        A prospective study of patient safety in the operating room.
        Surgery. 2006; 139: 159-173
        • Catchpole K.R.
        • Giddings Anthony E.B.
        • Wilkinson M.
        • et al.
        Improving patient safety by identifying latent failures in successful operations.
        Surgery. 2007; 142 (Available at:): 102-110
      6. The non-technical skills for surgeons (NOTSS) structuring observation, feedback and rating of surgeons' behaviours in the operating theatre system handbook v2.0. Available at: https://www.rcsed.ac.uk/media/682516/notss-system-handbook-v20.pdf. Accessed March 2022

        • Lindegger D.J.
        • Abahuje E.
        • Ruzindana K.
        • et al.
        Strategies for improving quality and safety in global health: Lessons from nontechnical skills for surgery implementation in rwanda.
        Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021; 9 (Available at:): 481-486
      7. WHO Patient Safety & World Health Organization, (2009). WHO guidelines for safe surgery 2009: safe surgery saves lives, World Health Organization https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44185.

        • Oodit R.
        • Biccard B.
        • Nelson G.
        • et al.
        ERAS society recommendations for improving perioperative care in low- and middle-income countries through implementation of existing tools and programs: An urgent need for the surgical safety checklist and enhanced recovery after surgery.
        World J Surg. 2021; 45 (Available at:): 3246-3248
        • Haynes A.B.
        • Weiser T.G.
        • Berry W.R.
        • et al.
        A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population.
        New Engl J Med. 2009; 360 (Available at:): 491-499
        • Ademuyiwa A.O.
        • Medina A.R.
        • Nawara C.
        • et al.
        Pooled analysis of WHO surgical safety checklist use and mortality after emergency laparotomy.
        Br J Surg. 2019; 106 (Available at:): e103-e112
        • Delisle M.
        • Pradarelli J.C.
        • Panda N.
        • et al.
        Variation in global uptake of the surgical safety checklist.
        Br J Surg. 2020; 107 (Available at:): e151-e160
        • Hellar A.
        • Tibyehabwa L.
        • Ernest E.
        • et al.
        A team-based approach to introduce and sustain the use of the WHO surgical safety checklist in tanzania.
        World J Surg. 2019; 44 (Available at:): 689-695
        • Conley D.M.
        • Singer Sara J.
        • Edmondson L.
        • et al.
        Effective surgical safety checklist implementation.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2011; 212 (Available at:): 873-879
        • White M.C.
        • Peven K.
        • Clancy O.
        • et al.
        Implementation strategies and the uptake of the world health organization surgical safety checklist in low and middle income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Ann Surg. 2021; 273 (Available at:): e196-e205
        • Ljungqvist O.
        • de Boer H.D.
        • Balfour A.
        • et al.
        Opportunities and challenges for the next phase of enhanced recovery after surgery: A review.
        JAMA Surg. 2021; 156: 775-784
        • Wilson R.D.
        • Caughey A.B.
        • Wood S.L.
        • et al.
        Guidelines for antenatal and preoperative care in Cesarean delivery: Enhanced recovery after Surgery Society recommendations (Part 1).
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 219: 523.e1-15
        • Caughey A.B.
        • Wood S.L.
        • Macones G.A.
        • et al.
        Guidelines for intraoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced recovery after surgery society recommendations (part 2).
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 219: 533-544
        • Macones G.A.
        • Caughey A.B.
        • Wood S.L.
        • et al.
        Guidelines for postoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) society recommendations (part 3).
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 221: 247.e1-9